UN’s Reporting Mechanism on Arakan Criticized for Bias and Structural Failures
UN HR Cheif, IIMM Chief, Special Rapporteur International concerns are rising over what analysts describe as a deeply flawed and inconsistent United Nations (UN) reporting system on Arakan, with critics arguing that the mechanisms designed to ensure neutrality and accountability have instead contributed to misinformation, selective narratives, and political bias. Observers within Arakan and across the region say that UN bodies increasingly rely on incomplete, unverified, or one-sided information, leading to reports that fail to reflect the realities experienced by the diverse communities living in the conflict-affected areas. For years, the UN has positioned itself as an impartial institution tasked with defending human rights and documenting abuses. However, local civil society groups, independent researchers, and humanitarian monitors argue that Arakan has become a glaring example of how the system breaks down when field presence is limited and reporting structures are he...